Vol. 75 No. 1 (2023)
Original Articles

Seven years of experience in operated patients of proctological pathology under major ambulatory surgery modality with user satisfaction study

José Manuel Vivanco Aguilar
Universidad de Concepción. Hospital Clínico Regional Dr. Guillermo Grant Benavente de Concepción.
Bio
Camilo Veyl Quinteros
Universidad de Concepción.
Bio
Misael Ocares Urzúa
Universidad de Concepción
Bio
Christian König Petit-Laurent
Hospital Clinico regional Concepción
Bio
Gino Caselli Morgado
Universidad de Concepción Hospital Clínico Regional Dr. Guillermo Grant Benavente de Concepción.
Bio
Claudio Benavides Yañez
Universidad de Concepción. Hospital Clínico Regional Dr. Guillermo Grant Benavente de Concepción.
Bio

Published 2023-01-25

How to Cite

1.
Vivanco Aguilar JM, Veyl Quinteros C, Ocares Urzúa M, König Petit-Laurent C, Caselli Morgado G, Benavides Yañez C. Seven years of experience in operated patients of proctological pathology under major ambulatory surgery modality with user satisfaction study. Rev Cir. [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 25 [cited 2026 Aug. 21];75(1). Available from: https://revistacirugia.cl/index.php/revistacirugia/article/view/1621

Abstract

Objective: To present the results of 7 years of colorectal surgery on mayor ambulatory surgery (MAS) and to determine patient satisfaction.

Methods: A descriptive observational study of patients undergoing proctological surgery under the MAS modality was carried out at Regional Hospital of Concepción between 2012 and 2019. The SUCMA-14 satisfaction survey was applied.

Results: 632 patients were evaluated in the study period. With statistically significant differences between pathologies for age, gender and BMI. The survey was applied to 270 patients who answered and responded. The results showed that, in general, the perception of the patients is positive, with exceptions, such as postoperative pain for warts and hemorrhoids, and postoperative complications for pilonidal disease. When the multivariate analysis corresponding to the survey is performed, it does not allow distinguishing between the diagnoses, but when applied to the surgical variables, it clearly shows that there is a distinction between them, with a disadvantage for pilonidal disease.

Discussion: The differences in terms of surgical times, complications and re-hospitalizations do not necessarily affect the perception that patients have of the MAS, since it depends on other factors and not only on the surgical results.

Conclusion: Results were concordant to what is described in the international literature, with worse results for pilonidal disease. Patient satisfaction was positive in general, without a clear distinction by pathology. We believe that MAS is recommended in proctological pathology both for its results and for the satisfaction it generates in patients.