Vol. 72 No. 6 (2020)
Original Articles

Comparative study of preoperative diagnostic precision and laparoscopic confirmation of hiatal hernia

Italo Braghetto
Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile
Bio
Manuel Figueroa-Giralt
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile

Published 2020-11-24

How to Cite

1.
Braghetto I, Cuneo N, Zamorano M, Rojas J, Piñeres A, Figueroa-Giralt M. Comparative study of preoperative diagnostic precision and laparoscopic confirmation of hiatal hernia. Rev Cir. [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 24 [cited 2026 Aug. 21];72(6). Available from: https://revistacirugia.cl/index.php/revistacirugia/article/view/594

Abstract

Introduction: Being type I hiatal hernia (HH) the most frequent, is difficult to define objectively and therefore, the main focus of controversy is the diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to report the results regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative study and to confirm it with the laparoscopic diagnosis of hiatal hernia.

Materials and Method: This descriptive and prospective study includes patients with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent esophageal-gastro-duodenoscopy, manometry and radiological study of esophagus with barium swallow. Only patients in whom endoscopy reveals the existence of HH by sliding < 5 cm are included. These patients underwent surgical treatment confirming or not the existence of HH at the time of laparoscopic exploration.

Results: The positive predictive value and sensibility for manometry was 51.2% and 70%, for radiology 91.7% and 80.5%, and for endoscopy 85.3% and 70.7% respectively.

Conclusion: For the reliable diagnosis of HH before treatment, the three mentioned investigations must be mandatory before the surgery.